东亚国家或地区社会代际流动水平和模式的差异比较

本文试图通过比较中国 251505 、日本、韩国和中国台湾代际职业阶层流动状况，一方面检验“FJH假设”在东亚国家的适用性，另一面寻找中国收入不平等问题的社会流动特征。本文以准对称模型（quasi symmetry model）、对数乘积层效应模型（log-multiplicative layer effect model）及核心模型（core model）作为基本分析工具，比较四个国家或地区在绝对流动、结构流动、相对流动上的异同点。本文的实证结论首先支持了“FJH 假设”的部分结果，同时发现中国体力劳动阶层和非体力劳动阶层都出现了新的封闭性。

This paper intends to analyze the basic situation intergenerational mobility among China, Japan, Korea, and China Taiwan, to examine the applicability of the FJH hypothesis in East Asia and look for the features of social mobility focusing on the question of income inequality in China.Our research distinguishes the intergenerational occupational mobility changes caused by structural changes and relative flow opportunities, and compares the similarities and differences between four countries or regions in the absolute flow, structural mobility and relative mobility with the quasi symmetric model, UNIDIFF model and Core Model.The empirical results supports the partial results of the"FJH hypothesis", at the same time, both the working and the non-manual labor class have emerged in a new obstructive way in the redistribution process of the relative status and relative opportunities in China.